To view the report in PDF format, you first need to
download the free Adobe Acrobat Viewer. The Acrobat Viewer will launch the file so that
you can see the document on your monitor and then print it. Download Adobe Acrobat.
Download
the Report
|
|
GAO-02-33
Medicare+Choice Audits:
Lack of Audit Follow-up Limits Usefulness
October, 2001
Congressional Committees
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
(CMS), formerly known as the Health Care Financing Administration,
spent about $35 billion dollars in 2000 on Medicare+Choice,
Medicare's managed care alternative to its fee for- service program.
During this time, almost 6.3 million Medicare beneficiaries were
enrolled in health plans
offered by managed care
organizations (MCO) that participate in the Medicare+Choice program.
Annually, a MCO choosing to participate in the Medicare+Choice
program must submit an Adjusted Community Rate Proposal (ACRP) for
each plan that it intends to offer to CMS for its review and
approval. The ACRP identifies the health services the MCO will
provide to its Medicare members and the estimated cost of providing
those services. It also shows the estimated payments that the MCO
expects to receive for providing these services. According to CMS,
the purpose of its review of the ACRPs is to ensure that the MCO
benefit packages provide all Medicare covered benefits, and that any
excess of estimated payments over the MCO plans estimated costs of
providing the Medicare benefits are used by (1) providing additional
services, (2) reducing beneficiary premiums or copayments, (3)
distributing the excess to a benefit stabilization fund,
or (4) using a combination
of these.
The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA)
enacted the
Medicare+Choice program, which included several changes to the ACRP
process. Among these, BBA required CMS to audit the ACRPs4
and supporting financial
records of at least one-third of the participating Medicare+Choice
organizations annually and required that we monitor these audit
activities.
To fulfill our responsibility
under the act, we (1) evaluated CMS process for auditing the ACRPs
to determine if it met BBA requirements and financial audit
standards and (2) identified significant findings resulting from the
audits and CMS plans and efforts for resolving them. This report
summarizes our work and provides recommendations to the CMS
Administrator that we believe will improve the ACRP process.

|