To view the report in PDF format, you first need to
download the free Adobe Acrobat Viewer. The Acrobat Viewer will launch the file so that
you can see the document on your monitor and then print it. Download Adobe Acrobat.
Download
the Report
|
|
August
2002
Veterans Benefits: Quality
Assurance For Disability Claims and Appeals Processing Can Be
Further Improved (GAO-02-806)
For fiscal year 2002, the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) will pay $25 billion in cash
disability benefits to 3.3 million disabled veterans and their
families. Veterans who are dissatisfied with VA's 57 regional
offices' decisions may file appeals with VA's Board of Veteran's
Appeals. In about half of such appeals, the Board has either
granted the benefits denied or returned the cases to regional
offices for rework. Additionally, VA reported an accuracy rate of
less than 70 percent for regional office disability decisions when
it tested a new quality assurance program in fiscal year 1998.
When the Board itself denies benefits, veterans may appeal to the
U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. In over half of these
appeals, the Court has either granted the benefits denied by the
Board or returned the decisions to the Board for rework. In fiscal
year 1998, the Board of Veteran's Appeals established a
quantitative evaluation program to score its decision making
accuracy and collect data to improve decision making. The accuracy
measure used by the Board understates its true accuracy rate
because the calculations include certain deficiencies, such as
errors in a written decision's format, which would not result in
either a reversal or a remand by the Court. VA does not assess the
consistency of decision making across the regional office and Board
disability adjudicators even though VA acknowledges that in many
cases adjudicators of equal competence could review the same
evidence but render different decisions. Although available
evidence indicates that variations in decision making occur across
all levels of VA adjudication, VA does not conduct systematic
assessments to determine the degree of variations that occurs for
specific impairments and to provide a basis for determining ways
to reduce such variations.  |