The complete text of this report is available
directly from the GAO web site in Portable Document (PDF) format.
To view the report in PDF format, you first need to
download the free Adobe Acrobat Viewer. The Acrobat Viewer will launch the file so that
you can see the document on your monitor and then print it. Download Adobe Acrobat.
Download
the Report
|
|
June
2002
Foster Care: Recent Legislation
Helps States Focus on Finding Permanent Homes for Children, but
Long-Standing Barriers Remain (GAO-02-585)
In response to concerns about the
length of time children were spending in foster care, Congress
enacted the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 (ASFA). The act
contained two key provisions intended to help states more quickly
move the more than 800,000 children estimated to be in foster care
each year to safe and permanent homes. One of these provisions,
referred to as "fast track", allows states to bypass
efforts to reunify families in certain egregious situations. The
other provision, informally called "15 of 22", requires
states to file a petition to terminate parental rights when a
child has been in foster care for 15 of the most recent 22 months.
Although the number of adoptions has increased by 57 percent since
the act was enacted, changes in other foster care outcomes and the
characteristics of children in foster care cannot be identified
due to the lack of comparable pre- and post-ASFA data. Although
data on states' use of the act's two key performance provisions
are limited, some states described circumstances that hinder their
use. Survey data suggest that a few states used the fast track
provision infrequently. In general, states are most frequently
using the new adoption-related funds provided by the act to
recruit adoptive parents and provide post adoption services. The
states involved in the survey are addressing long-standing
barriers to achieving permanency for foster children such as court
delays and insufficient court resources, difficulties in
recruiting adoptive families for children with special needs,
obstacles and delays in placing children in permanent homes in
other jurisdictions, and poor access to some services families
need to reunify with their children. States are testing different
approaches, but the data are limited on the effectiveness of these
practices.  |