To view the report in PDF format, you first need to
download the free Adobe Acrobat Viewer. The Acrobat Viewer will launch the file so that
you can see the document on your monitor and then print it. Download Adobe Acrobat.
Download the Report
Find a
wealth of reports, white papers and other behavioral
health and social service resources in the
OPEN
MINDS
Industry Resources Library. |
|
|
May 16, 2006
The Care of Patients with Severe Chronic Illness: An Online Report on the
Medicare Program
This edition of the Dartmouth Atlas reports on the last two years of life among
Medicare enrollees with severe chronic illnesses the services received by
Medicare enrollees who died between 1999 and 2003 and who had at least one of 12
common chronic conditions. The most prevalent conditions in this cohort were
congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer. It
concentrates on inpatient acute care hospitals and physician services under
Medicare Part A and B. Other services provided under traditional Medicare will
be reported in upcoming editions of the Atlas. Medicare Part C data are not
available. The first section shows that, contrary to a common assumption,
variation in overall Medicare spending per beneficiary is not driven
by variation in the prevalence of chronic illness.
Chapter one provides an overview of the problem of 'supply-sensitive? care. It
first reviews the evidence that the supply of resources is closely associated
with the frequency of use of physician visits, hospital admissions, and
diagnostic tests. Chapter two looks at variations among the states and the
District of Columbia and examines important relationships among resources,
utilization, and quality. States that rely more on primary care physicians than
on medical specialists in managing chronic illness tend to have lower Medicare
spending and use fewer hospital beds, less physician labor, and fewer referrals
to multiple specialists' and have better quality scores (measured by CMS's
Hospital Compare database).
Chapter three reports on the remarkable variation in managing
chronic illnesses among prominent academic medical centers. It
illustrates the use of best practice benchmarking in evaluating the
performance of the University of California Medical Center Los
Angeles and the University of California Medical Center San
Francisco, two academic medical centers that belong to the
University of California Hospital System. The two medical centers
differ substantially in per decedent spending, resource inputs, and
utilization. Chapter four introduces the tools available on the
Dartmouth Atlas web site to graphically display variation and
generate reports comparing hospital, regional, and state
performance. The chapter provides an example that describes
variation in performance among hospitals located in the Fort Myers,
Florida hospital referral region. Chapter five focuses on the
problem of overuse of supply-sensitive care during the last two
years of life.
Excerpt

|