The complete text of this report is available
directly from the GAO web site in Portable Document (PDF) format.
To view the report in PDF format, you first need to
download the free Adobe Acrobat Viewer. The Acrobat Viewer will launch the file so that
you can see the document on your monitor and then print it. Download Adobe Acrobat.
Download
the Report
|
|
May 2002
DC Family Court: Additional
Actions Should Be Taken to Fully Implement Its Transition
(GAO-02-584)
The District of Columbia Family
Court Act of 2001 was enacted to (1) redesignate the Family
Division of the Superior Court as the Family Court of the Superior
Court, (2) recruit trained and experienced judges to serve in the
Family Court, and (3) promote consistency and efficiency in the
assignment of judges and the courts actions and proceedings. The
act requires the chief judge of the Superior Court to submit a
transition plan outlining the proposed operation of the Family
Court. The plan shows that the Superior Court has made progress
transitioning its Family Division to a Family Court, but
challenges remain. The transition plan addresses most, but not
all, of the act's required elements. For example, the plan
identifies the number of judges and magistrate judges needed and
outlines an approach for closing or transferring cases from other
divisions to the Family Court. However, the plan does not include
(1) a request that the Judicial Nomination Commission recruit and
the president nominate the additional judges the court believes
are necessary, (2) the number of non-judicial staff needed for the
Family Court, (3) information on the qualifications of the judges
selected for the court, and (4) information on how the court
determined the number of magistrate judges to hire under the
expedited process provided for in the act. Although not
specifically required by the act, the plan includes information on
performance management and enumerates performance measures that
are oriented more toward the court's processes than on outcomes.
Measures that focus on outcomes for children and families could
help to optimize the court's performance. This testimony is based
on a May report (GAO-02-534).

|