The complete text of this report is available in Portable Document (PDF) format.
To view the report in PDF format, you first need to
download the free Adobe Acrobat Viewer. The Acrobat Viewer will launch the file so that
you can see the document on your monitor and then print it. Download Adobe Acrobat.
Download
the Report
|
|
February, 2001
The American College of Mental
Health Administration
Accreditation Organization
Workgroup
A Proposed Consensus Set of
Indicators for Behavioral Health
This report reflects the
commitment of the American College of Mental Health
Administration, and each of the accreditation organizations
participating in the Workgroup, to advance the partnership between
consumers, purchasers, providers, and others in quality
measurement and improvement. Behavioral healthcare is not really a
free market enterprise most consumers cannot knowledgeably
choose the best provider, and various surrogates (government,
managed care companies, families, courts, and primary care
physicians) often preempt their ability to choose. We cannot
simply say, "let the buyer beware," and trust the market
to ensure the best and most efficacious services. Advocacy and
organized consumer groups have done much to represent the
interests of individuals and families. Hopefully, our work will
further advance the ability of consumers to be knowledgeable and
active.
We present this work with
the belief that efforts towards improving quality and increasing
accountability in the behavioral health field will continue. We
hope our legacy and contribution will be:
- A clear explanation of
the elements of quality assessment.
- A substantial step
forward in consensus and convergence on quality measurement
within the mental health and substance abuse fields.
- An ongoing
relationship between the accrediting organizations that will
carry forward into the future.
- An advance in the
goals of compassionate care enlightened and empowered by
science.
- The availability of
information to support consumers in making informed decisions
about quality and care.
There is clearly more
work yet to be done. We have dealt with the why and what
questions about quality measurement. The very difficult
challenges in the how remain to be addressed. The technical
issues about data, measurement and implementation need to be
resolved. Our work is immediately relevant to he world of adult
mental health services, but its applicability to children s
services and to substance abuse services requires further
consideration.
 |