To view the report in PDF format, you first need to
download the free Adobe Acrobat Viewer. The Acrobat Viewer will launch the file so that
you can see the document on your monitor and then print it. Download Adobe Acrobat.
Download the Report
Find a
wealth of reports, white papers and other behavioral
health and social service resources in the
OPEN
MINDS
Industry Resources Library. |
|
|
2006
The Costs & Benefits of Universal Preschool in California
The California debate about the merits of Proposition 82, which
would institute a voluntary, free preschool program for all
four-year olds in the state, centers on financial and social
benefits that may occur in the long term. Much of the debate centers
on research done by the RAND Corporation in a study to evaluate a
program in Chicago, Illinois. To help Californians apply the
findings of that research to their current ballot box decision on
June 6, 2006, the RAND researchers have released a version of the
findings that only considers the features of the program proposed by
Proposition 82.
The RAND research assumes a one-year, universal, high-quality
program. A two-year program would generate greater benefits but
probably not in proportion to the higher cost. A program targeted at
disadvantaged children would be less costly and generate more
benefits per dollar expended. However, it would incur administrative
costs of determining eligibility, would risk stigmatizing
participants, and would unavoidably miss some children in families
who could benefit but do not meet the eligibility criteria or are
confused about the eligibility rules. Attempting to save money by
reducing the emphasis on high quality would presumably reduce
benefits, but it is not possible to say by how much.
RAND researchers noted two further lines of reasoning that
support adoption of a universal preschool program in California:
- If viewed as an economic
development strategy (because of its long-term economic benefits),
universal preschool compares favorably with other such
strategies e.g., expansion of local infrastructure, business
assistance, and workforce education and training. Such
alternatives may "generate" jobs that would have been created
anyway or may simply draw jobs that would have been generated in
neighboring communities
- Public-sector investment in K-12
education has been justified as a critical investment in human
capital with long-term benefits. Notably, K-12 education is a
universal program. The same argument could be made on behalf of
preschool. Public funds would be used to make an investment having
a long-term payoff for society as well, whether in the form of
lower government outlays or a higher future standard of living
Excerpt
|